Latest News

Coronary function testing vs angiography alone to guide treatment of...

Abstract

Background and Aims

Invasive coronary function testing (CFT) identifies coronary vasomotor disorders in up to 90% of patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). The ILIAS ANOCA trial hypothesized that routine ad hoc CFT would be feasible, safe, and effective in providing an early, comprehensive diagnosis. Additionally, it was anticipated that combining CFT with a disease-specific treatment protocol would significantly improve quality of life in ANOCA patients compared with standard care.

Methods

After excluding patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) during clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA), eligible patients underwent CFT and were randomized to either the standard care group, where CFT results remained blinded, or the intervention group, where CFT results were disclosed along with a tailored medical therapy protocol. The primary outcome was the mean difference in the within-subject change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score (SAQSS) between groups from baseline to a follow-up of 6 months. The trial is registered with the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (NL-OMON20739).

Results

A total of 255 patients consented, of whom 153 patients (60%) without CAD underwent CFT and were randomized 1:1 to the standard care (n = 76) or intervention group (n = 77). All CFT procedures were successful without adverse events. A vasomotor disorder was identified in 120 patients (78%). At 6-month follow-up, the SAQSS improved significantly in the intervention group compared with the control group, with an intervention effect of 9.4 units (95% confidence interval 3.9–14.9, P = .001). There were no major adverse cardiac events at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Routine CFT during the initial ICA was feasible, safe, and had high diagnostic yield. Implementing a pragmatic CFT protocol combined with a disease-specific treatment protocol significantly improved disease-related quality of life in patients with ANOCA compared with standard care.

Structured graphical abstract Graphical summary of the study flow, safety outcomes, CFT diagnoses, and primary outcome of Seattle Angina Questionnaire Summary Score change from baseline to a follow-up of 6 months. ANOCA, angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries; CFT, coronary function testing; CI, confidence interval; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; SAQ, Seattle Angina Questionnaire

Introduction

The diagnostic and therapeutic approach for patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) is evolving from a simplistic approach focused on diagnosis and treatment of obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD) to include a comprehensive assessment of the functional status of the coronary circulation to assess causes of angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA).

ANOCA is present in 50%–70% of patients with CCS who are referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and can originate from a diverse range of pathophysiological mechanisms. Invasive coronary function testing (CFT) involves additional assessment of coronary vasomotion and microvascular function to test for coronary vasomotor function disorders during ICA. Notably, when CFT is performed, underlying coronary vasomotor disorders are detected in up to 90% of patients. These disorders include impaired (microvascular) vasodilation and epicardial and/or microvascular vasospasm, reflecting functional and/or structural abnormalities of the coronary (micro)circulation. Each of these conditions has been associated with significant burden of anginal symptoms, impaired quality of life, increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, and substantial healthcare utilization and associated costs.

The European Society of Cardiology has recently recommended CFT for persistently symptomatic patients with ANOCA despite medical treatment (Class I, Level of Evidence B) to identify potentially treatable ANOCA endotypes and to improve symptoms and quality of life. As such CFT is typically reserved for the situation where initial medical therapy has failed and involves a second invasive procedure. However, given that 50%–70% of patients undergoing ICA have ANOCA, implementing ad hoc CFT during the initial ICA could reduce time to diagnosis without the need for ancillary invasive procedures and may lead to earlier symptomatic improvement. Both the Coronary Microvascular Angina (CorMicA) and Advanced Invasive Diagnosis for Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Coronary ANGIOgraphy (AID-ANGIO) studies previously demonstrated a high diagnostic yield of ad hoc CFT in patients presented to the catheterization laboratory for suspected CAD. The CorMicA trial additionally concluded that an ad hoc CFT approach to guide medical therapy improves quality of life in ANOCA patients, but further evidence supporting the clinical benefit of this strategy remains limited.

The ILIAS ANOCA (Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes—Angina with No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease) trial aimed to explore the clinical utility of ad hoc CFT in a multicentre setting. We hypothesized that a routine ad hoc CFT strategy, combined with a disease-specific treatment protocol, would lead to a significant improvement in quality of life among patients with ANOCA compared with standard care. Additionally, we proposed that routine ad hoc CFT would be both feasible and safe in routine clinical practice, offering an effective means of providing an early and comprehensive diagnosis.

Keywords

Share this article

Get Informed

Learn all about the symptoms, causes and triggers of these heart conditions.

Educate. Inform. Enlighten.